Re: Automatic free space map filling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: Automatic free space map filling
Date
Msg-id 20060301201828.GB26934@sparkey.oopsware.intra
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Automatic free space map filling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:41:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> How does an optimistic FSM entry avoid the need to run vacuum?
> 
> > It ensures that all freed tuples are already in the FSM.
> 
> That has nothing to do with it, because the space isn't actually free
> for re-use until vacuum deletes the tuple.
> 

Hmm, but couldn't such an opportunistic approach be used for another leightweight VACUUM mode in such a 
way, that VACUUM could look at a special "Hot Spot" queue, which represents potential candidates for 
freeing? Let's call it a 2-phase VACUUM....this would avoid a long running VACUUM run on big tables, 
e.g. when tuples gets updated (or deleted) frequently. Just an idea...
       Bernd



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Summit, Call for Contributions
Next
From: seth.m.green@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK