On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:01:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:17:23PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>> Possibly we could make EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXECUTE set the random-access
> >>> bits.
> >>
> >> Good point. Whichever we do will be wrong in some cases.... I've no real
> >> opinion on this other than a vague preference for it to be quick.
>
> > Wouldn't an EXPLAIN ANALYZE DECLARE ... have the right information to
> > know if backward scan, etc was needed?
>
> There is no EXPLAIN ANALYZE DECLARE, and AFAICS it would be a
> contradiction in terms to have one, since DECLARE doesn't run the query.
> Perhaps the correct addition would be EXPLAIN ANALYZE FETCH. (EXECUTE
> is unrelated, now that I think harder about it.)
You have no idea how glad I am that I'm not the only one who doesn't know about
'new' features (this first appeared in the docs in 7.4)... :)
decibel=# explain analyze declare test cursor for select * from pg_users; QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on pg_authid (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=79)
Filter:rolcanlogin
(2 rows)
So, since presumably that accepts a full cursor declaration, would that suffice
for controlling EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
BTW, ISTM that it would also be useful to have EXPLAIN FETCH, since you
could have already defined a cursor. But I suspect a more common case
would be cut & paste of the declare from application code into psql,
which would make EXPLAIN DECLARE easier to use. Though, I never really
use cursors, so...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
