Re: Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf
Date
Msg-id 20060225160300.GD4756@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Schema vs Independant Databases, ACLS,Overhead,pg_hba.conf  ("Eric Lauzon" <eric.lauzon@abovesecurity.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Eric Lauzon wrote:

Hi,

> Now that the issue is that we can't implement a per connection user/ACL
> pair  , would it be a good idea to implement
> Schema ACLS and mabey pg_hba.conf Schema acls

This is certainly possible to do using GRANT and REVOKE on the schemas;
no need to fool with pg_hba.conf.  You can of course create groups/roles
to simplify the assignment of privileges, as needed.

Apart from the much more efficient queries (i.e. using cross-schema
queries instead of dblink), I don't think you're going to see much
change in performance, because most things like WAL and shared buffers
are shared among all databases anyway.  You'd save a bit by not having
multiple copies of system caches (pg_class cache, etc), but I wouldn't
know if that's going to be very noticeable next to the primary
improvement.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Next
From: Javier Somoza
Date:
Subject: fsync and battery-backed caches