Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Date
Msg-id 20060223205118.GU4984@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Foreign keys for non-default datatypes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane wrote:

> Any thoughts about details?  My feeling is that we should tie RI
> semantics to btree opclasses, same as we have done for ORDER BY
> and some other SQL constructs, but I don't have a concrete proposal
> right offhand.  The btree idea may not cover cross-type FKs anyway.

This means getting rid of SPI usage, right?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: memory context for tuplesort return values