Re: [HACKERS] Patch Submission Guidelines - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Patch Submission Guidelines
Date
Msg-id 200602152350.33300.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patch Submission Guidelines
List pgsql-patches
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 20:42, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 16:00, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > I would like to suggest that we increase substantially the FAQ entries
> > > relating to patch submission. By we, I actually mean please could the
> > > committers sit down and agree some clarified written guidelines?
> >
> > As I remember, there is a disinclination to increase the size of the
> > FAQ very much. This suggests maintaining it as a seperate document. Or
> > alternatively attach it as an appendix to the main documentation.
>
> Huh?  The current developers FAQ is at least 1/2 the size of the main FAQ.
> I think adding a submission on patch submission guidelines is a great idea.
> I'll have a patch based on Simon's post to -patches ready in the next 24
> hours unless someone is really going to object.

As stated, the following patch adds a list of patch submission guidelines
based on Simon Riggs suggestions to the developers FAQ.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: constant too large in port/gettimeofday
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch Submission Guidelines