Re: Backslashes in string literals - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Backslashes in string literals
Date
Msg-id 200602131725.k1DHP8C25526@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backslashes in string literals  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> This patch doesn't leave the standard_conforming_strings entry in guc.c
> with the GUC_REPORT flag, which it needs for psql to work right.  Should
> I submit one last patch with this fix and the proper "expected"
> regression file?  If so, where should I send it?  (The hackers list
> won't take a file as big as that patch.)

Oh, I was just going to add the GUC_REPORT when I applied the patch.  I
put that email in the patch queue so I would not forget.

I you want, send a mega patch to the patches list,
pgsql-patches@postgresql.org.  One large patch is usually safest to
apply.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use cases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql & readline & win32