Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance
Date
Msg-id 20060211174435.GL57845@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance
Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:32:02AM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I think the point that Martijn was trying to make was that per our docs
> it would be perfectly acceptable for us to make any cursor NO SCROLL
> implicitly if it means less work for the optimizer.

Ok, I take that back. The actual quote[1] is:

"Depending upon the complexity of the query's execution plan, specifying
SCROLL may impose a performance penalty on the query's execution time."

Clearly that says it can affect execution time, not that we're free to
alter the default behavior at will.

But speaking of documentation, it doesn't actually say what the default
is. Care update that, or should I formally submit a patch?

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-declare.html
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance