Re: Storing Digital Video - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Albert Cervera Areny
Subject Re: Storing Digital Video
Date
Msg-id 200602060930.31144.albert@sedifa.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Storing Digital Video  (Rodrigo Madera <rodrigo.madera@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Storing Digital Video
List pgsql-performance
A Dimecres 01 Febrer 2006 01:32, Rodrigo Madera va escriure:
> I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
> a database.
>
> I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
>
> 1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
> 2) Store each frame in a separate record in the table "frames".
> 3) (type something here)
>
> Thanks for the help,


What if you store meta data in the database and use some PL/Python/Java/Perl
functions to store and retrieve video files from the server. The function
would store files to the files system, not a table. This avoids the need for
a file server for your application while making your relational queries fast.

Any experiences/thoughts on this solution?

>
> Rodrigo
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index occupancy
Next
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: Default autovacuum settings too conservative