Where are we on this patch?
I am thinking it should be in the most logical place, rather than in
pg_ctl. One call isn't a big deal, especially if you can run the
postmaster without using pg_ctl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > If the job object code is moved to the postmaster, it'll
> > work when not
> > > running as a service as well.
> >
> > I'd just as soon keep all that Windows-specific cruft in pg_ctl.
> > So I think the way you've got it set up is fine.
>
> Well, it'd all be localised to the backend/port/win32 directory of
> course, except for a single call - where there is already "windows
> cruft".
>
> But. I see your point. And the vast majority of production
> installations run as service anyway. So I won't spend any time making
> those changes, I'll leave what's on -patches now.
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
