Re: Multiple logical databases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Multiple logical databases
Date
Msg-id 20060202162121.GD5173@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple logical databases  ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Woodward wrote:

> Seriously? No use at all? You don't see any purpose in controlling and
> managing multiple postgresql postmaster processes from one central point?

I'd rather spend effort in fixing the problems that arise from big
databases; for example Hannu's patch for concurrent vacuum attacks one
of the problems that IMHO are important.  More elaborate partitioning
does too.

Anyway, if you're very excited about it, I don't think it's impossible
to code a super-postmaster that would redirect a client to the real
postmaster.  I even think it can be done without modifying the regular
postmaster.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: streamlined standby process
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases