Re: BUG #2223: Misleading info in docs on volatility level of functions - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: BUG #2223: Misleading info in docs on volatility level of functions
Date
Msg-id 20060131003251.GP3920@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #2223: Misleading info in docs on volatility level of functions  ("" <dueyduey@freemail.hu>)
List pgsql-bugs
This was recently discussed on -docs and I believe a patch was applied
to at least HEAD.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:33:35AM +0000, dueyduey@freemail.hu wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference:      2223
> Logged by:
> Email address:      dueyduey@freemail.hu
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1
> Operating system:   linux
> Description:        Misleading info in docs on volatility level of functions
> Details:
>
> Hi, all!
> The documentation on how to and why declare a function STABLE or IMMUTABLE
> is very laconic. It makes clear what promises I make when determining the
> volatility of my functions but it fails to point out what exactly I can
> expect in turn for my promises.
> See also the discussion on bug#2150 on the pgsql-bugs list.
> Thanks for bothering.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug#347548: DOMAIN CHECK constraint bypassed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug#347548: DOMAIN CHECK constraint bypassed