Re: Update & Lack of Error Message - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From
Subject Re: Update & Lack of Error Message
Date
Msg-id 20060127001345.80365.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update & Lack of Error Message  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Responses Re: Update & Lack of Error Message
List pgsql-novice
--- Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:22:37PM -0800,
> operationsengineer1@yahoo.com wrote:
> > i set up an update statement to update a unit's
> status
> > from incomplete to completed.
> >
> > however, pgsql doesn't kick out an error message
> when
> > i try to update something that doesn't exist.
>
> The database has no way of knowing that a certain
> number of rows
> updated (zero in your case) represents an error;
> that's something
> the application knows.  An update that affects zero
> rows is perfectly
> legitimate in many applications.
>
> > i'm thinking about running a select to check the
> > existence of the serial number before running the
> > update.  that way, i can check that the serial 1.
> > exists and 2. hasn't already been updated and,
> based
> > on the result, kick out a message to the user as
> > appropriate.
>
> Your API should provide a way to get the number of
> rows updated.
> What language and database interface are you using?
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>

ADOdb - and thanks for the idea.

i can run the query, check for rows updated and then
do whatever makes sense from that point.

a zero row update can still mean two things, though -
the serial doesn't exist or the serial exists, but
already has been updated to the new value.  i need to
decide if that distinction will be important enough to
differentiate the error messages.

thanks again.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Update & Lack of Error Message
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Update & Lack of Error Message