Re: info is a reserved word? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Michael Fuhr
Subject Re: info is a reserved word?
Date
Msg-id 20060113045756.GA88336@winnie.fuhr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: info is a reserved word?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> plpgsql is not very good about reserving words "minimally", ie, not
> treating a word as a keyword outside the context where the keyword
> is meaningful.
> 
> This could probably be fixed, or at least greatly reduced, with some
> flex/bison hacking.  Anyone up for it?

Possibly.  Would it involve much more than what the main parser's
grammar does with unreserved_keyword and friends?  I suppose this
ought to move to pgsql-hackers.

-- 
Michael Fuhr


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: info is a reserved word?
Next
From: Adam Rosi-Kessel
Date:
Subject: ORDER BY does not work as expected with multiple joins