Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
Date
Msg-id 20060111210221.GD63175@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?  (Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>)
Responses Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:39:47PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > CREATE INDEX indexname ON tablename ( position(' PREEMPT ' in kernel_version) );
>
> The index only helps the above query with = 0 and not the one with != 0,
> but it seems not needed in practice.

Hrm. If you need indexing then, you'll probably have to do 2 indexes
with a WHERE clause...

CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) = 0;
CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) != 0;

I suspect this is because of a lack of stats for functional indexes.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?