Re: [PERFORMANCE] Beetwen text and varchar field - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Steinar H. Gunderson
Subject Re: [PERFORMANCE] Beetwen text and varchar field
Date
Msg-id 20060109114940.GB28748@uio.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PERFORMANCE] Beetwen text and varchar field  (TNO <tnodev@free.fr>)
Responses Re: [PERFORMANCE] Beetwen text and varchar field
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:58:19AM +0100, TNO wrote:
> what is the best for a char field with less than 1000 characters?
> a text field or a varchar(1000)

They will be equivalent. text and varchar are the same type internally -- the
only differences are that varchar can have a length (but does not need one),
and that some casts are only defined for text.

If there's really a natural thousand-character limit to the data in question,
use varchar(1000); if not, use text or varchar, whatever you'd like.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: TNO
Date:
Subject: [PERFORMANCE] Beetwen text and varchar field
Next
From: Alessandro Baretta
Date:
Subject: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan?