Re: Reordering columns in a table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Reordering columns in a table
Date
Msg-id 20060106200320.GU3902@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reordering columns in a table  (John McCawley <nospam@hardgeus.com>)
Responses Re: Reordering columns in a table
List pgsql-general
Actually, I'm pretty sure this is on the TODO. It can't really happen
until we have the ability to somehow divorce on-disk ordering from
what's presented in the catalog. It's not exactly rocket science to make
this happen, but it is quite a bit of work...

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:59:12AM -0600, John McCawley wrote:
> I believe that it makes a lot of practical difference, just like
> organizing related code into files, classes etc. is important for
> clarity.  This isn't a trivial thing, and the other (sarcastic?)
> suggestion that I reorder my select misses the point.
>
> I think that having a good visual representation of the database is
> extremely important.  So much so that I wrote my own tool to do it
> because one didn't exist for Postgres at the time.  But I also think
> it's important for this visual representation to be tied to the database
> such that changes to the DB reflect in the visual representation and
> vice versa.  That's why I was asking my question about column order.  It
> would be bad to allow a user to move a column in the visual
> representation when it is unable to be modified in the database.
>
> I'm sure that it's a difficult feature to implement at the database
> level, and I'm sure there are sound technical reasons why it hasn't been
> implemented, but I do believe that it is a desirable feature.
>
>
> Berend Tober wrote:
>
> >John McCawley wrote:
> >
> >>Is there a way to change the order of columns in a table in Postgres
> >>after it has been created?  ...
> >
> >
> >The best way to do it is when you have the opportunity to do a
> >restore, edit the pg_dump output between the dump and the restore
> >steps. There are other approaches that might not be feasible depending
> >on circumstances, like dropping and recreating the table and reloading
> >data, but you have to deal with foreign key and other dependencies and
> >so it is probably more work than justifiable for something that makes
> >no practical difference.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Berend Tober
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> >      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> >      match
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexes works only on miss
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ./configure --with-openssl=path fails