Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Stone
Subject Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
Date
Msg-id 20051227190516.GB6811@mathom.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?  (Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
Responses Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?  (Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 11:50:16AM -0500, Ron wrote:
>Sorry.  A decade+ RWE in production with RAID 5 using controllers as
>bad as Adaptec and as good as Mylex, Chaparral, LSI Logic (including
>their Engino stuff), and Xyratex under 5 different OS's (Sun, Linux,
>M$, DEC, HP) on each of Oracle, SQL Server, DB2, mySQL, and pg shows
>that RAID 5 writes are slower than RAID 5 reads

What does that have to do with anything? That wasn't the question...

>RAID 5 is not a silver bullet.

Who said it was? Nothing is, not even RAID 10. The appropriate thing to
do is to make decisions based on requirements, not to make sweeping
statements that eliminate entire categories of solutions based on hand
waving.

Mike Stone

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Frank Wiles
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problems with 8.1.1 compared to 7.4.7
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?