I ask other developers: what's your opinion?
I know the man may need it but I don't think we want it. We
have to support Oracle, Informix, MySQL, ... special commands than.
I hope we don't need parse statements before execute them
in new development version so it could be slowdown in the future.
Regards,
Luf
> Summary: MSSQL syntax
>
> Initial Comment:
> MSSQL have a command that Postgresql don't support:
>
> @@spid
>
> This command returns MSSQL connection pid.
>
> I've a application that uses this query. I can't change code, but
> i need that psqlodbc ignore this command.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >Comment By: Ludek Finstrle (luf)
> Date: 2005-12-27 10:01
>
> Message:
> I don't know if we want this behaviour. When you move to other DB
> do you think they will add support for this?
>
> I need to talk about it with other developers. I'm againist this
> kind of support.
>
> @@spid is whole command or is it located inside statements?
>
> If you're a little bit familiar with C you can hack it into psqlodbc
> code yourself (I think in PGAPI_Prepare and PGAPI_ExecDirect).
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Comment By: Nobody (None)
> Date: 2005-12-27 02:25
>
> Message:
> can psqlodbc to transform all "@@xyz" syntax in:
>
> xyz()
>
> ?????