Re: Next development steps? - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Ludek Finstrle
Subject Re: Next development steps?
Date
Msg-id 20051221133923.GE30837@soptik.pzkagis.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Next development steps?  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-odbc
> > I don't think release have to wait for this one.
>
> I do, because Tom will be needing a good release for inclusion in FC5,
> otherwise it may end up being rolled back to an 07.xx release if he
> thinks the problem is too risky to release (which it sounds like he
> does).

Ok. I didn't know this informations. But I can try it in January at first.
What's the deadline?

> > There are known bugs:
> > - report for sqlstate (1000495) - I try to solve it now.
> >   + 1 waiting

Solved (I hope).

> > - SEGFAULT during SQLCancel (1000475)
> >   + 0 waiting
> > - private announce about problems with Text larger than X bytes
> >   + 1 waiting

I hope I'll solve it before the end of week.

> > I don't know what all you want to give into new release.
>
> Not sure what you mean?

It looks to me that psqlodbc-08.01.0105 with bug 1000475 solved is
the most stable since libpq conversion.
I don't use cleanups as I wrote before.

But the most features has 07.03.255 from Hiroshi Saito.
When we create new stable branch why don't create one for 07.03?

> OK, I'm not worried about cleanups as long as it is as bug-free as
> possible.

I don't worry about bugs but about losing next steps to updateable cursor.

Regards,

Luf

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Next development steps?
Next
From:
Date:
Subject: [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000495 ] duplicate key causes HY000 SQL-State