> > > was done in the past) and if you provided the source code
> > somewhere.
> > > This is "open source" software after all. And making binary only
> > > releases might also be considered a license violation.
> >
> > I think all patches goes through pgsql-odbc mailing list so if anyone
> > would get the source he can. I don't think over a license violation.
> > If you think it's license violation I have to remove older dev
> > snapshots (it's too time consuming to get source for it) and I'll add
> > source code for latest dev snapshot).
> >
> > What's your opinion?
>
> I think Peter's being a little over cautious. There have been psqlODBC
> snapshots released without source releases right back to when Byron was
> maintaining it years ago. They are 'official' project snapshots, built
> for testing purposes by the primary copyright holders (PGDG) and
> released onto the project site which hosts the source repository. AFAICR
> I'm the only one who ever did release source tarballs with snapshots.
Ok. I don't remove old snapshots. I put source code for dev snapshot
8.01.0105 when I come at home. I add source code tarball in future with
dev snapshots.
Regards,
Luf
