Greg Stark wrote:
> Using iso-8859-1 to encode "é" as a single byte versus using UTF8
> which would take two bytes to encode it is an issue of using two
> *different* encodings.
But that's not what we are discussing.
> There is a separate issue that some characters could theoretically
> have multiple representations even within the same encoding.
That is what we are discussing.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
