Re: Bug#342369: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Martin Pitt
Subject Re: Bug#342369: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible
Date
Msg-id 20051213172629.GD30925@piware.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug#342369: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible
List pgsql-ports
Hi Stephen!

Stephen Frost [2005-12-13 11:06 -0500]:
> Honestly, in the end I think the default should be changed.  It could
> fall-back to double with a warning (if it doesn't already) if the
> compiler doesn't support 64bit integers.
> [...]
> I don't think the Debian default should be changed though.  If, say, an
> m68k user actually complained about the default not being the right
> option for them then I'd say we should consider having configure options
> be different for those architectures and not that we should move
> everyone to using doubles.

I fully agree. (BTW, I doubt that double operations on m68k would be
any faster than integer ones...)

Thanks,

Martin

--
Martin Pitt        http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?

Attachment

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug#342369: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible