> After reading the explanation, this seems way too specialized a
> situation to make a good argument that we need a general feature
> of the sort.
Ok, however, thanks for your time on it, anyway!
> You can get to where you need to be by passing an indicator in
> the trigger arguments
Argh, it's always the simple stuff ;)
Had been overlooking TG_ARGV[] here, that should prove to be a nice
compromise, thanks for the hint!
--
Best,
Frank.
