Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date
Msg-id 200512031453.jB3Err204555@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > They are called "Readline" and "Libedit".
> >
> > I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality.
>
> The functionality may be called "command-line editing" but I don't see
> how that relates to what actually appears in the patch.

When you use --without-readline, it really means without libreadline and
libedit.  One solution would be to rename that --without-lineediting,
but that might confuse people.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: "Michael Paesold"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?