Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date
Msg-id 200512031301.jB3D1Jm23880@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...
> >
> > OK, updated text:
> >
> >   --with-openssl          build with OpenSSL support
> >   --with-libedit-preferred  prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> >   --without-readline      do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> >   --without-zlib          do not use Zlib
>
> They are called "Readline" and "Libedit".

I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality.  Why is
it Readline?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?