Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date
Msg-id 200512021852.jB2Iq7q01866@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >   --with-libedit-preferred  prefer libedit over readline
> >   --without-readline      do not use Readline
>
> Possibly
>     --without-readline      do not use readline or libedit
>
> In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...

OK, updated text:

  --with-openssl          build with OpenSSL support
  --with-libedit-preferred  prefer Libedit over Libreadline
  --without-readline      do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
  --without-zlib          do not use Zlib

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype