Re: ice-broker scan thread - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: ice-broker scan thread
Date
Msg-id 20051129175217.GG31333@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ice-broker scan thread  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:57AM -0700, David Boreham wrote:
> Actually, after reading up on the current state of things, I'm not sure you
> can even get POSIX aio on top of kernel aio in Linux. There are also a
> few limitations in the 2.6 aio implementation that might prove troublesome:
> for example it only works with O_DIRECT.

Which is bizarre because it's semantically equivalent to having a
seperate thread doing the read() and sending you a signal when it's
done. What I'm thinking of testing is a join across two large table so
there is actually more than one outstanding request at a time. But it's
irritating to have to code to a special api...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Date:
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Next
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread