Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
Date
Msg-id 200511271055.15924.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB  (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 14:50, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I case people on this list have not seen the slashdot discussion
> (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/23/0228258&tid=221&tid
>=218), it appears that MySQL has announced a commitment to provide a
> replacement to InnoDB to their customers.  I wanted to just fill in a
> few gaps that came up during my research.
<snip>
>
> So my conclusion is that MySQL is biting off quite a bit with this
> commitment.  One really does not know how long it would take them to
> create such a table architecture froms scratch or indeed whether they
> are able to if they try.
>

If only there was another open source database that used mvcc that was
bsd-licensed, then they could use that as a starting point and have the
control over it that they want.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: bostic@sleepycat.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on MySQL and InnoDB
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Change in authentication for @postgresql.org addresses