On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:18:26AM -0800, Steve Crawford wrote:
> Not trivial? Seems to me more like impossible to implement for the
> general case which would require you to resolve the situation where
> someone requests multiple, overlapping, clustered partial indexes
> where the ordering requirements are in conflict.
Well, currently you can only cluster on a single index per table, and I
really doubt that will change. In any case, if someone's going to work
on clustered indexes I think it would be much more worthwhile to make
them self-maintaining (or at least more self-maintaining).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
