Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent
Date
Msg-id 20051115012612.GA17840@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I think we should rerun pgindent on 8.1.X and HEAD to correct the
> > reported problems.  I am betting 90% of our patches either come from
> > CVS head or 8.1.X branches greater than 8.1.0.
> 
> Can you post a diff showing what would change exactly?
> 
> I'd like to hold off for at least a little bit on reindenting HEAD,
> because I've got a fair size set of changes for nulls-in-arrays that
> I'm still a day or two away from committing.  Reindenting right now
> is likely to cause a rather painful merge problem because I updated a
> lot of comments.  I'm not sure who else has major patches in progress
> (anyone out there?), but I may not be the only one with a problem.

I have two moderate-size patches that I'm planning to submit shortly.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: functions marked STABLE not allowed to do INSERT