MERGE vs REPLACE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject MERGE vs REPLACE
Date
Msg-id 200511112101.56178.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: MERGE vs REPLACE  (Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@seznam.cz>)
Re: MERGE vs REPLACE  (Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>)
Re: MERGE vs REPLACE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
It seems to me that it has always been implicitly assumed around here 
that the MERGE command would be a substitute for a MySQL-like REPLACE 
functionality.  After rereading the spec it seems that this is not the 
case.  MERGE always operates on two different tables, which REPLACE 
doesn't do.

That said, what kind of support for insert-or-update-this-row do we want 
to provide, if any?  Should it be a REPLACE command, an extension of 
the INSERT command, a modication of the MERGE syntax, or something 
else?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: someone working to add merge?
Next
From: Harald Fuchs
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1 substring bug?