Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Creager
Subject Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1
Date
Msg-id 20051102161942.000047fd@C118181.stortek.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:19:44 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Robert Creager <Robert.Creager@Sun.com> writes:
> > TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(shared->page_number[slotno] == pageno &&
> > shared->page_status[slotno] == SLRU_PAGE_READ_IN_PROGRESS)", File: "slru.c",
> > Line: 309)
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01385.php
> 
> If you can reproduce the failure with any reliability, please try
> one or both of the proposed patches:
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00240.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00248.php
> 

Ran with both for an hour with no problem, where I could produce the ASSERT
failure within minutes for the non patched version.

Thanks,
Rob


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data