Re: Installation trouble -- oops - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Crawford
Subject Re: Installation trouble -- oops
Date
Msg-id 200510310800.17603.scrawford@pinpointresearch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Installation trouble -- oops  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Installation trouble  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Saturday 29 October 2005 22:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> writes:
> > Is postgresql (or some parts thereof) now using relative pathing
> > and has that behavior changed?
>
> As of 8.0 we attempt to determine the libdir, sharedir etc as
> relative to the location of the executable.  So you can't just "cp"
> the PG executables to somewhere else without also copying the
> associated support files into parallel directories.  I believe
> symlinking the executables will work fine though (ie, we look
> through the symlink before doing the relative-path calculation).

Yes, the symlinking did appear to work fine. Thanks for the
confirmation that it is an acceptable option.

Cheers,
Steve

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Starting PostgreSQL 8.0.4 with more memory [FreeBSD
Next
From: Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?