Re: pg_dump with low priority? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From CSN
Subject Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Date
Msg-id 20051024191806.91378.qmail@web52910.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump with low priority?  (Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org>)
Responses Re: pg_dump with low priority?  (Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
nice comes to mind:

nice pg_dump ...



On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 07:39, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> We have a huge database which must be backed up
every day with
> pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an
hour to produce the
> dump file, and all other processes on the same box
are starved for
> cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's
not just an
> inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious
problem that needs to
> be addressed.
>
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a
lower priority? I
> don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of
half an hour, as
> long as other processes were getting their fair
share of cycles.



__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Arthur Hoogervorst
Date:
Subject: Re: Map of Postgresql Users (OT)
Next
From: Aaron Glenn
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump with low priority?