Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Date
Msg-id 20051017185025.GF86144@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase  (elein <elein@varlena.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:20:00AM -0700, elein wrote:
> The scenario that no one has mentioned wrt postgresql and oracle is
> that oracle can take the source code, branch it or not and support it.
> If they branch, it will have less credibility and it will become "interesting".
> But support money from a big name company (Oracle) should be
> forthcoming in either case.
>
> Long term that does not help the support companies, like mine and those
> mentioned above.  Or maybe it does because we're smaller and faster.

I suspect that if Oracle were to actually formally endorse PostgreSQL by
offering support that people would be falling all over themselves to
find out what "this PostgreSQL thing" was all about. It would probably
be a win for everyone already doing work with PostgreSQL; existing
customers probably wouldn't be motivated enough to change support
providers just because it's Oracle, and meanwhile many people would look
to see who else was offering Oracle support.

Of course, Oracle could tank the market by offering support at
un-competitive prices, but I can't think of a reason for them to do that
off the top of my head.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner regression in 8.0.x ?
Next
From: Matthew Peter
Date:
Subject: Re: searching array