Re: On "multi-master" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: On "multi-master"
Date
Msg-id 20051013184634.GR16317@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On "multi-master"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This particular issue is fixable as of 8.1: pgpool should be using
> 2-phase commit.

Sure, but if we're talking about what people can put in production
today, I don't think 8.1 + pgpool with 2-phase commit is on the list.
(We got started down this road, I think, because someone was wanting
a multi-master system right away.)  But I think it will be soon.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
        --Alexander Hamilton

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?