On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:33:42PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:22:40PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:12:53PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > Why the vacuum? Seems a bit sever to do a vacuum of an entire
> > > database just because you created a temp table.
> >
> > Excess enthusiasm about reclaiming space. It doesn't really need
> > to be there :)
>
> I think it needs to be commented on, one way or another. Better to
> explain that this will slowly bloat pg_class than have a mystery
> vacuum that many people have no idea why it's there...
Patch fixes always welcome :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
