Re: Spinlocks and CPU Architectures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Spinlocks and CPU Architectures
Date
Msg-id 200510111845.59222.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spinlocks and CPU Architectures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Spinlocks and CPU Architectures
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> This seems pretty unworkable from a packaging standpoint.  Even if
> you teach autoconf how to tell which model it's running on, there's
> no guarantee that the resulting executables will be used on that same
> machine.

A number of packages in the video area (and perhaps others) do compile 
"sub-architecture" specific variants.  This could be done for 
PostgreSQL, but you'd probably need to show some pretty convincing 
performance numbers before people start the packaging effort.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks and CPU Architectures
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 8.1beta3 out soon