Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From CSN
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Date
Msg-id 20051008180424.16774.qmail@web52903.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?  (Matthew Terenzio <matt@jobsforge.com>)
List pgsql-general
> On 10/6/2005 4:37 AM, Tzvetan Tzankov wrote:
>
> > They have collation and multiple characterset per
table and etc. which actually is from 4.1 (not new in
5.0), and postgresql have only one collation per
database cluster :-(
> > Otherwise I think their features are all there,
but cannot be used togather most of them (you can have
foreign key, but not using fulltext ...)
>
>
> AFAIK MySQL's fulltext indexing is only supported on
MyIsam tables, so if you want to use it, you lose
ACID, hot backup and a couple other nice things
entirely for that part of your data. Many MySQL users
still believe that the pluggable storage engine design
is an advantage ... I think one storage engine that
supports the full feature set is better.
>
> Jan

I agree - MySQL really has a confusing array of
different database engines:

# MyISAM
# MERGE
# ISAM
# HEAP
# InnoDB
# BDB or BerkeleyDB Tables
# Example
# Archive
# Federated
# CSV
# Blackhole
# NDB Cluster

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/storage-engines.html

CSN



__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Next
From: John Dean
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase