Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Date
Msg-id 20051008015451.GF36108@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:44:34AM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> CSN wrote:
> >Yep, I think the SQL spec says fold to uppercase. I'm
> >not sure why PostgreSQL folds to lowercase instead,
> >but if folding has to occur, I prefer lowercase.
>
> I think preference was why lowercase was chosen many moons ago. It's
> stayed that way because otherwise existing users would be storming the
> -hackers list with pitchforks and flaming torches.

If any change was made I'm sure it would be to allow the user to decide
which way case was folded. But IMHO, anyone messing around with object
names that won't fold is asking for trouble anyway.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT FOR SHARE and FOR UPDATE