Re: Some spinlock patch tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emil Briggs
Subject Re: Some spinlock patch tests
Date
Msg-id 200510071010.55145.emil@baymountain.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some spinlock patch tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Emil Briggs <emil@baymountain.com> writes:
> > I was testing the spinlock patches that Tom Lane posted last month
> > on a quad opteron system running Suse 9.2 for x86_64.
>
> Exactly which patch is this, and against what base version of Postgres?
> Also, what's the hardware (no, "x86_64" isn't specific enough)?
>

It's the patch referenced here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg00566.php
from the thread titled "Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches"
I applied all the pieces of the patch against v8.0.4. The hardware is a 
Celestica A8440 with 4 2Ghz Opterons and 16Gbytes of RAM. 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: prefix btree implementation
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Shell script to extract a table from a plain text dump