Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Date
Msg-id 20051003131716.GB15212@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG Killed by OOM Condition  ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>)
Responses Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:03:06PM +1000, John Hansen wrote:
> Might it be worth while protecting the postmaster from an OOM Kill on
> Linux by setting /proc/{pid}/oom_adj to -17 ?
> (Described vaguely in mm/oom_kill.c)

Has it actually happened to you? PostgreSQL is pretty good about its
memory usage. Besides, seems to me it should be an system admisitrator
descision.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "John Hansen"
Date:
Subject: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated documentation for new sequence binding