TAS definitions on Solaris x86 with GCC - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Michael Crozier
Subject TAS definitions on Solaris x86 with GCC
Date
Msg-id 200509271638.12467.crozierm@conducivetech.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: TAS definitions on Solaris x86 with GCC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-ports
Hello,

I'm again looking at tas/spinlock build problems while investigating unusually
high CPU usage during load testing.  My issue was first mentioned here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2005-09/msg00001.php

Version details:
  Postgresql 7.4.8
  Solaris 10, AMD64
  GCC 3.4.3

To my untrained eye, it appears that configure chooses two versions of tas()
for this combination (regardless of 32/64-bitness).  I'm trying to determine
whether this is a correct interpretation and if so, which version of tas() of
the correct version to be using with GCC on Solaris.


When building Postgresql on Solaris using GCC, the configure script appears to
link tas.s to tas/solaris_i386.s.  This file compiles in 32bit mode, but not
in 64bit (I manually linked to dummy.s when compiling in 64bit).  The
following symbols are from the 32bit build.

   $ nm src/backend/port/tas.o
   00000000 T tas
   $ nm src/backend/port/SUBSYS.o  | grep tas
   00000c90 T tas


In addition to tas.s, configure also enables the proper #defs for the inline
tas() definition in s_lock.h:

   --- from line 97 ---
   #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* AMD Opteron */
   #define TAS(lock) tas(lock)

   static __inline__ int
   tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
   {
       register slock_t _res = 1;

       __asm__ __volatile__(
           "    lock            \n"
           "    xchgb    %0,%1    \n"
   :        "=q"(_res), "=m"(*lock)
   :        "0"(_res));
       return (int) _res;
   }

These three tas symbols included from s_lock.h:

   src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.o
   000002fa t tas
   src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.o
   00000483 t tas
   src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.o
   0000017b t tas

   src/backend/storage/lmgr/SUBSYS.o
   000047e2 t tas
   0000270b t tas
   00004c3b t tas


Thanks for any suggestions or insight,

 Michael Crozier



pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: haibin zhang
Date:
Subject: The full runtime environment of Mingw for test
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TAS definitions on Solaris x86 with GCC