Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date
Msg-id 200508291519.j7TFJujA031756@smtp.osdl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:27:35 -0500
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:45:38PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > So the short answer is possibly "You build the tests and we'll run 'em."
> 
> Would some version of dbt2/3 work for this?

Yeah, trying...  On the larger system I'm using I'm not seeing much of a
performance difference but I'm looking for a way to see if we can
identify any benefit to bypassing the kernel cache.  I've been
re-arranging disks due to failures and trying to tweak a couple of
profiling things, but I'll try to get some data to share within a few
days.

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 Thread safetyness
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget