pgman wrote:
> Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature? I know
> we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems
> unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could
> be enabled/disabled.
>
> I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.
So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename
this before beta starts.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
