On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:34:29AM -0500, Don Drake wrote:
> I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be
> built in.
It's being discussed in pgsql-hackers:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-08/msg00633.php
Do you have any use cases in addition to what's already been
mentioned? Sleeping isn't really a database operation, so there
needs to be some justification for making it a standard function.
--
Michael Fuhr
