Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200508192019.j7JKJlw29506@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL ("Lance Obermeyer" <LObermey@pervasive.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL
("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Why not just put the mark into the public domain? I think it might already be there. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lance Obermeyer wrote: > Agree that having the Foundation be the administrator makes sense. > > I assume the process would be something like this. > 0. Legal counsel is retained. > 1. Business terms of licensing the marks is decided. This would cover the approval process, requirements and fees, ifany. > 2. Contract language for sublicensing the trademark to interested parties is drawn up. Something sort of like http://www.linuxmark.org/linux_license_doc.html > 3. Trademarks are transferred to the Foundation, or a contract is executed giving the Foundation the right to grant perpetualsublicenses. This isn't that hard. > 4. The program is rolled out. This presumably includes an online form like this http://www.linuxmark.org/license.html. > 5. People like Pervasive sign up to be licensed users of the mark. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 3:03 PM > To: Lance Obermeyer > Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Robert Bernier > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Linux trademark and PostgreSQL > > > > Whether the licensor (e.g. the owner of the mark) is a private individual or the "PostgreSQL Foundation" is not relevantfrom the perspective of the licensee. That is a separate question. > > > > Pervasive is interested in becoming a formal licensee of the mark. Just to be clear, we have no desire to be the exclusivelicensee. > > > We believe that the bar to becoming a licensee of the mark should be low, just as the bar to using the software is. We would > > >contribute to the creation of a licensing contract, up to assisting in the creation of a PostgreSQL Mark Institute asthe licensing vehicle if that is what makes the most sense. > > I believe using the PostgreSQL Foundation for this is the most appropriate. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
pgsql-advocacy by date: