Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Fetter
Subject Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
Date
Msg-id 20050811005433.GB13973@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...  (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:42:59PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> >I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle
> >compatiblility.
> >
> >What exactly does this mean?  They don't go into any details.  Did
> >they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?
>
> I don't know the full details but my understanding is they
> implemented things like IN/OUT parameters and a superset of pl/SQL.

I spoke with them today at LWE/SF.  They have a subset of PL/SQL (no
packages yet, but they're working on it for A Really Big Client) and
are able to do in-line anonymous PL/SQL blocks.  I'm hoping we can
talk them into helping us do in-line anonymous PL/Foo based on what
they've done for this. :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance riddle
Next
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...