Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 200508081048.36375.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh,

> > My actual point was that we could put a lot of the options in a global
> > table that could be adjusted versus having the flat file.

You were aware of the virtual view pg_settings, right?

I've considered before adjusting pg_settings so that it would take UPDATEs and 
convert them to SET statements.   However, I'm not really sure what the 
benefit of this would be.

As for making PostgreSQL.conf shorter, I'm personally always open to 
suggestions of settings which are useless and could be removed (backed by 
testing, of course).  See our earlier discussion on commit_siblings.   

ANd if you think PostgreSQL is bad, you should see Oracle ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Remote administration functionality
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: shrinking the postgresql.conf