* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> However, on second thought I'm not sure that this is sensible anyway.
>
> Consider that every role is implicitly a member of PUBLIC --- so isn't
> the above a creation of a circular membership loop, which is (for good
> reason) forbidden by the spec?
Ah, yes, you're right. I won't claim to have considered that in the
original working of the patch though. :)
Stephen
